Home » Lifestyle » Roundup’s Toxic Chemical Glyphosate, Found in 100% of California Wines Tested

Roundup’s Toxic Chemical Glyphosate, Found in 100% of California Wines Tested

The wine is just made from grapes, right?

Well, the answer is a bit more complicated than that.

Very few wines are still being made with grapes, yeast and sulfur alone. Instead, enzymes, extracts, sugar, water can be added to the mixture to obtain the desired texture and flavor ( 1 , 2 ).

These ingredients are not a big problem, but there is a little something extra that will never see on the label :. glyphosate

So, the main ingredient toxic herbicide of Monsanto Summary found in any sample of 10 tested wines by moms across America and Pulse sustainable . Even organic and biodynamic products tested positive for the chemical.

Study Results

Microbe Inotech Labs in St. Louis, Missouri California examined wine originally from Napa, Sonoma and Mendocino counties ( 3 ).

Syrah, from a biodynamic and organic garden that apparently never was sprayed with pesticides, was found to contain 0.659 ppb, while another contained .913pb organic wine. In comparison, a 2,013 ppb 18.74 Cabernet Sauvignon containing glyphosate.

The glyphosate doses as low as 1 ppb annihilate beneficial intestinal bacteria while regular exposure can cause breast cancer, destroy nerve cells, damage the kidneys and liver. In pregnant and fertile women, substance destroys the placenta and may lead to future birth defects and miscarriages.

In a similar study to that mentioned above, Decanter magazine reported that 90% of the wine they tested contained traces of at least one pesticide. This is not only alarming for consumers, but also for farmers applying the treatment.

Not everyone agrees, however.

Jennifer Putnam, Executive Director of Grape Producers Napa Valley, insisted that she is skeptical of the study but that “… no one is more interested in a healthy environment of the vineyard other than [the growers] “. She warns that “If you eliminate the tool to use glyphosate to become much more labor and shoveling back to work.”

Other groups in favor of agriculture GMO, including Monsanto toxicologist Dr. Donna Farmer, insist that the wine does not contain significant levels of glyphosate. Dr. Farmer went on to say: “A person, for example a 150-pound person would have to drink about 8,000 regular-sized bottles of wine a day to meet the acceptable daily intake for glyphosate.”

The Environmental Protection Agency US He explains that it is safe for a 150-pound person to consume up to 120 milligrams (one teaspoon) of glyphosate per day. Given that glyphosate is present in almost all food produced conventionally and has begun to pollute water sources and organic soil, it is no wonder that we are facing the increasing allergies, inflammatory diseases and digestive disorders related to chemistry.

The long-term exposure to glyphosate

These increasing sources of exposure are worrying. Dr. Michael Antoniou, of Kings College London, said: “There is a growing body of evidence that glyphosate exposure levels below regulatory limits established safety anywhere in the world, given enough time can lead a potentially serious disease. ”

health problems glyphosate

Since its inception in 1974, the US has used more than 1.8 million tons of glyphosate. Worldwide, 9.4 million tons have been sprayed on crops to date ( 4 ).

Related Post:  If You See This “Weed” Growing In Your Yard, Don’t Pick It! Here’s Why…

It was not until March 2015 that the World Health Organization International Agency for Research on Cancer stated the substance as “probably carcinogenic to humans”.

Monsanto is actively trying to fight this assertion , and the same classification issued by the Evaluation Office of Environmental Health Hazard California ( 5 ).

Although glyphosate is mainly used as a herbicide, is actually patented as an antibiotic ( 6 ). This may be part of the reason why the substance has as much impact on human health. It is believed that excessive use of the chemical is also contributing to widespread resistance antibiotics .

Other known health effects include:

  • The elimination of beneficial intestinal bacteria
  • chronic inflammation
  • leaky gut
  • cell death ( 7 )
  • breast cancer ( 8 )
  • hormonal disruption ( 9 )
  • reproductive problems
  • birth defects ( 10 )
  • neurotoxicity ( 11 )
  • oxidative damage

research is showing again and again that glyphosate is dangerous, but it is not the only ingredient in Roundup it is toxic. The International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health writes ( 12 ):

“pesticide formulations containing active ingredients declared and formulants presented as inert and confidential compounds. We tested the endocrine disruption of formulants in six glyphosate-based herbicides (GBH) … All formulants and formulations were comparable cytotoxic [toxic to living cells] well below the agricultural dilution of 1 percent (18 to 2000 times to formulants , 8-141 times for formulations).

… it was shown for the first time that endocrine disruption GBH not only could be due to the active ingredient declared, but also to the interveners.

These results could explain numerous results in vivo with GBHS not seen with G [glyphosate] alone; on the other hand, question the relevance of the value of acceptable daily intake (ADI) for GBHS exhibitions, calculated from currently testing toxicity of the active ingredient declared itself “.

The European Union is still on the fence on whether or not to renew the 15-year concession for the legal use of the chemical. Although the renovation has been rejected twice, the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) will study the health problems of complaints for next year before revisiting the issue ( 13 ).

is important to understand that the chemical is inherently toxic. It is so harmful that actually kills the crops sprayed on, which explains in part why it is so effective in killing unwanted weeds. Many claim that crops are genetic engineering to improve the taste and resistance, but one of the main reasons why modern crops are designed so that it survive exposure to the chemical.

Monsanto has so much influence on the subject of legislation that despite the growing evidence against glyphosate, US Environmental Protection Agency now allows fifty times more glyphosate maize what it did in 1996. The agency has also increased what is considered safe in terms of glyphosate contamination by 17 times.

In its press release, Moms Against America glyphosate insists that the product not only end up in the food we eat; it actually stays in our bodies. The chemical has even been found in humans breast milk ( 14 ).

Related Post:  10 Secret Kitchen Hacks Which Only Chefs Know

How does it end up in wine?

Briefly, glyphosate is used in almost all crops conventionally grown worldwide.

In this specific case, glyphosate is sprayed directly on wine or fruit vine plant, but rather on the floor between rows of plants. Despite his attempts to keep the substance of crops, the evidence shows that grapes and grape products are almost always contaminated.

Worse, contaminated soil chemicals can retain up to 20 years after it was first applied.

not only wine

Other alcoholic beverages have also been criticized for its glyphosate content, in particular German beer.

The Munich Environmental Institute found the substance in higher doses than the limit of 0.1 micrograms allowed in drinking water in one of the 14 best-selling German beers ( 15 ).

American beer has not yet been tested, but German beer is subject to “Das Reinheitsgebot”, a law on food purity limiting the ingredients of beer only water, barley, yeast and hops ( 16 ).

“In contrast to our colleagues abroad, German brewers do not use artificial flavors or preservatives, enzymes,” explains Hans-Georg NDE, president of the Federation of Brewers Germans ( 17 ).

beer enthusiasts argue that traces of glyphosate in beer directly violate this law ( 18 ).

Organic vs non-organic wine

Although you may think that having a glass of wine will not do you much harm, consider this: In 2010 alone, more than 400,000 pounds of Roundup were used ( It is containing high levels of glyphosate) in bodegas ( 19 ).

By now you know that while organic wine may contain traces of glyphosate through exposure to contaminated soil and water, are much healthier than conventional wine choices.

Another major difference between the two is that conventional wine can legally contain hundreds of chemicals, including and natural artificial flavorings agents. Furthermore, organic wine can only contain chemicals 70, including naturally occurring acids, salts, enzymes, and more. In organic wine, the chemicals used can not have negative effects on the environment or human health.

Glyphosate is not all you have to worry; some of the other ingredients in Roundup and other herbicides are as bad as glyphosate or worsen the effects of this chemical. Current FDA guidelines only require pesticide companies to test the safety of the active ingredient, not necessarily the other ingredients, so it is difficult to know exactly what is ending up in the glass and on your plate.

Other chemical traces in conventional wine include dangerous amounts of pesticides such as azoxystrobin, dimethoate, pyrimethanil and 6 different common fungicides in quantities exceeding safety levels set by the government.

Needless to say that if you’re going to enjoy it organic. You may also want to detox your body of any possible contamination and replenish your intestinal bacteria .

You May Also Like :
==[Click 2x to CLOSE X]==
Trending Posts!

Sorry. No data so far.